Jerky Basics, Part 2: A Good Day To Dry

Can you make jerky without a dehydrator? Yes, you can. You can use a smoker, for one thing – but if you have a smoker, you probably already know a lot more than I do about its capabilities. But there are also other ways.

One way to make jerky is in the oven. Depending on the type of jerky you’re making, you can lay the strips horizontally across your oven racks, or use skewers to dangle them vertically between the rungs of a rack. There are also specially-made racks designed for hanging jerky in an oven.

The oven is kept at a very low temperature, and the door is usually propped open to allow moisture to escape.

Another method is the one demonstrated by Alton Brown on his Food Network series “Good Eats.” Alton does not like using heat on his jerky – he prefers the rare flavor to the cooked flavor. But regular dehydrators, if you ran them on a low-temperature setting, just don’t have enough power to dry the meat quickly with air power alone. And it’s important to dry the meat as quickly as you can in order to prevent spoilage. Alton’s solution is to use inexpensive furnace filters, connected by bungee cord to a box fan. I’ve wanted to try this ever since I first saw Alton do it on TV. I haven’t tried it yet, but I’m going to one of these days.

Here, from the Food Network web site, is a heavily-edited version of that episode of “Good Eats,” including Alton’s marinade recipe (which we’ll revisit in a later installment) and a look at his ingenious drying system.

So there are alternatives to a dehydrator. But I like my dehydrator – and I can use it not only for beef jerky, but for things like apple chips or banana chips. If I have extra onions, I can dry them. I can make fruit leather (a homemade version of the product sold in stores as Fruit Roll-Ups). For some people, a dehydrator is a kitchen gimmick. For me, it’s a useful tool, although I probably don’t use it as often as I ought.

Dehydrators are available year-round at Walmart – but at Christmastime, they generally have a larger selection. That’s not necessarily a good thing, because some of the added options are super-low-cost dehydrators in the $30 range. These do not have temperature controls. If you see a dehydrator without a temperature control, you know it’s set hot – for jerky-making. In fact, some are now set a few degrees higher than they used to be in order to hit the USDA-recommended temperature of 160 degrees for jerky-making.

The trouble is that without a temperature control, the dehydrator will be less-than-perfect for other tasks – banana chips, apple chips, herbs, fruit leathers and what have you. The packaging may claim the cheap dehydrator will still be versatile enough to do all those things, but trust me – they won’t turn out as well without the proper temperature setting for each job. And if you only use the dehydrator for jerky, it becomes a gadget instead of a tool. Spend a few dollars extra and get a dehydrator with a variable temperature setting.

I can’t give you a comprehensive comparison of various dehydrators; I’ve only owned three, and two of them have been essentially the same model. So please don’t take this as a comprehensive review. Also, let me say that this is not any sort of sponsored post and I have no connection to NESCO/American Harvest. (This site is a member of the Amazon Affiliates Program, and I’m including affiliate links for some of the mentioned products, but that won’t influence my reviews.)

Many of the more expensive, high-end dehydrators have trays in the form of drawers. I’ve not used one of these. All of my dehydrators have been the kind with stackable trays. The benefit of this is that the size of the dehydrator changes with the amount of jerky or other product you are drying. Check online before you buy – find out how many trays the dehydrator comes with and how many it will support. For example, my current dehydrator – a Nesco FD-60 Snackmaster Express – comes with four trays, but it’s powerful enough to work with as many as 12 trays. My previous dehydrator was also an FD-60, and I still have two trays from that one, so I can run with as many as six trays. The trays can also be bought as expansion kits.

The trays in the FD-60 use a plastic grate. I believe some of the higher-end dehydrators use screens.

The trouble with the plastic trays, as I discovered, is that they’re fragile. If you scrub them too hard, they’ll crack – and, eventually, break. I had so many broken trays that replacing them would have cost nearly as much as buying a brand new FD-60. I’ve learned my lesson. The owner’s manual to the new FD-60 advises you to simply soak the trays in soapy water, and then use a soft brush only if absolutely necessary to remove a few stubborn bits of stuck-on food. You can wash the trays in a dishwasher (which I don’t have), as long as you remove them before the drying cycle.

I think my two surviving “old” trays were actually expansion trays I bought separately, and so they were slightly newer than the others.

The FD-60 has the fan and heating element on top of the stack; some other units have it on the bottom. One benefit to having the motor on top is that there’s no way for wet items to drip into it, but I don’t think it’s a major issue either way. NESCO claims its trays force the air to blow horizontally across each tray, preventing the air streams from various trays from mixing together, and allowing you to dry various types of items together at the same time. I haven’t really tried this much, and there are limits to it anyway because, as previously noted, different items may require different temperatures anyway. NESCO also claims its system eliminates the need to rotate trays. Some dehydrators that blow vertically tend to give more attention to the trays closest to the motor, and so occasionally you have to shuffle the trays in order to ensure even drying.

Many dehydrators, including the FD-60, come with a fruit leather tray, a plastic sheet that’s used for drying fruit leathers into Fruit Roll-Up-style snacks. Just as with the trays, you can also buy additional sheets separately.

In a future post, we’ll talk about the differences between whole muscle (sliced) and ground meat jerky. But since we’re talking about equipment here, I’ll go ahead and mention another jerky accessory: a jerky gun. Depending on your interests or background, I can compare this to either a) a caulking gun or b) a cookie press. It’s a ratchet-driven gun that you use to extrude seasoned and cured ground meat into a thin strip for jerky-making. It’s the best way to make ground meat jerky. If you don’t have one, you can roll out the ground meat between sheets of wax paper, then cut it into individual strips, but it’s tricky to move the strips of jerky from a countertop or table onto the dehydrator without them falling apart. With the jerky gun, you can just extrude the strips directly onto the tray – no transportation necessary. The gun comes with tips to produce various types of strips (or even sticks, which will look like Slim Jims but have a completely different consistency). If you do have a cookie press, of course, you may have an existing die or nozzle that will work.

If you prefer whole muscle jerky, Hi Mountain Jerky makes an ingenious cutting board with a recessed inset which allows you to slice the meat at a consistent thickness. You set the piece of meat in the inset, then rest the knife blade on the raised edges on either side and draw it across horizontally, making a slice off the bottom exactly as thick as the recess is deep. There’s a 1/4” recess on one side of the board and a 3/8” recess on the other, so you can pick the size jerky you want to make. I haven’t used it, but it seems like a great idea. When you’re dehydrating jerky – or most other things – consistent thickness is important because it means everything will get done at the same time.

Now that we’ve talked about equipment, in the next installment we’ll talk about actually making jerky.


Jerky Basics:

Katherine Coble liked this post

Welcome To Night Vale

Weekend before last, I tore through the archives of a newly-discovered podcast find, “Welcome to Night Vale.” I hated having to wait for the new episode, which finally dropped yesterday (but which I didn’t get to listen to until this evening).

“Welcome to Night Vale” is a scripted podcast, primarily performed by one man. It’s in the form of a small-town radio broadcast, but for a very unusual small town:

Imagine that Garrison Keillor got tired of writing his “News From Lake Wobegon” and hired Stephen King, H.P. Lovecraft, and “X-Files” creator Chris Carter to write it for him. It’s hysterically funny – but you have to be paying attention, and you sort of have to be on the right wavelength.

If I can talk you into listening to this thing, you need to scroll down and start with the very first episode. There are running plot points that reward you for listening in order, and bits you may not get if you haven’t heard earlier episodes.

At times, they twist the format around a little – there’s a two-part episode in which part 1 falls under the usual format, but part 2 is performed by a different announcer and is written from the point of view of Night Vale’s rival community.  The most recent episode features “poetry month” in Night Vale – the normal prohibition on writing instruments is temporarily suspended, and in fact it’s mandatory for each resident to write a poem, a few of which our friendly announcer reads on air.

You can find the podcast here:

http://feeds.feedburner.com/WelcomeToNightVale

Or, if you use iTunes:

http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/welcome-to-night-vale/id536258179?mt=2&ign-mpt=uo%3D4

Highly recommended.

Jerky Basics, Part 1: An Overview

Regular readers of this blog are used to hearing about my jerky-making. I thought it would be fun to take some of what I’ve learned over the years, along with links to people who know a lot more than I do, and put all of the information in one place. So this is the first of a special series of jerky-related posts, which I hope will be interesting and useful.

I love jerky. What’s not to love? It’s salty, and smoky, and chewy, and (often) peppery, and just generally a wonderful snack. When properly made, it’s low-fat and high-protein (it’s nowhere near low-sodium, of course, so you can’t exactly call it health food).

Multiple sources I’ve found online suggest that the word “jerky” came from the Quechua word “ch’arki,” which the Spanish invaders turned into “charque.” Jerky began with the native Americans, and it was a way of preserving meat and making it easily transportable. Today, we think of salt and smoke as flavor elements, but the salt is actually there as a preservative, and the early jerky was dried over a fire, the smoke helping to keep away insects. Even the peppery flavor of jerky may relate to ancient people recognizing capsaicin’s natural anti-microbial properties.

In its finished form, jerky is well-preserved because it’s a quite inhospitable place for microbes. There’s little moisture, and that moisture is a hyper-saturated syrup of salt, sugar, and possibly other ingredients such as nitrite cures. The trouble comes in getting a nice, refrigerated piece of raw meat from point A to point B in a safe manner while preserving the expected flavor profiles. Jerky-making takes time, and time increases the risk of spoilage if you don’t handle the meat correctly.

There are differences of opinion about what’s safe and what’s tasty. The USDA insists that jerky be heated to a minimum of 160 degrees, essentially cooking it, before it is dried. But some sources, such as wildlife writer A.D. Livingston and Food Network personality Alton Brown, say that the flavor of cooked jerky is different and that carefully-sourced and carefully-handled meat can be dried at lower temperatures to preserve more of the rare beef flavor.

Jerky’s been around for ages, but its renewed popularity in the past decade or two stems from high-protein diet fads and from the easy availability of electric dehydrators. I use a dehydrator to make jerky, and so that’s most of what I’ll talk about here, but there are other methods, and I’ll mention them as well.

Making your own jerky has several advantages. It’s fun; it costs a lot less per ounce than store-bought jerky (although you may end up eating more of it, which eliminates some of the savings), and it lets you control flavors and ingredients.

First, let’s define what jerky is. Jerky can be made from a variety of meats, not just beef and venison. The selection of usable meats increases if you’re willing to cook the meat before drying it. Beef, of course, is readily available everywhere, and venison jerky is popular because it gives hunters a way to dispose of excess meat. A couple of years ago, a high-school classmate of mine had a large amount of venison and offered, if I would make it into jerky, to let me keep half of the finished product. I’d have done it as a favor to him, although I much prefer beef jerky to venison jerky. In any case, he never followed through.

Most of what I’ll write here applies equally well to beef and venison jerky, so if you’ve got venison, you’re in business.

Jerky, in its simplest form, is meat that has been flavored and/or cured, and then dried. It does not have to be — and should not be — completely dessicated or rock-hard. It should have enough moisture to remain chewable.

Beef sticks, like Slim Jims, are not beef jerky. They’re a form of sausage, made with a casing, and are much higher in fat than jerky. Jerky-makers try to avoid fat as much as possible.

There are two different types of jerky: whole muscle, or sliced, jerky, and ground meat jerky. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, which we’ll explore.

That’s a quick overview to get us started. In the next installment, I’ll talk about equipment.


Jerky Basics:

Ball of fire

When I was a young person, before I had discovered the wonders of the golden age of movies, I knew of some golden age movie stars as boring old people appearing on television. The Bob Hope who appeared on TV specials a few times a year was a far cry from the quick wit of a few decades previous. Never having seen the genius that is “Make ‘Em Laugh” from “Singin’ In The Rain,” I had no idea why I was supposed to be impressed by pudgy old Donald O’Connor as a guest passenger on “The Love Boat.”

Barbara Stanwyck was the grand matriarch of “The Big Valley,” a show that looked like it was probably boring and which my family never watched. Even as a child, I could tell it was supposed to be a copy of “Bonanza,” which would make Barbara Stanwyck the female equivalent of Lorne Greene.

Later, when I became slightly more aware of classic film, I learned that Stanwyck was the star of “Double Indemnity,” a classic film noir. I have since developed some appreciation for “Double Indemnity,” but I have to admit I’m not one of these noir fanatics, and so that didn’t really impress me either.

Then, over the past seven or eight years, and largely thanks to TCM, I’ve discovered Stanwyck the comedienne, especially in three terrific comedies I’ve blogged about here before.

The Lady Eve,” which aired tonight on TCM, pairs Stanwyck with Henry Fonda under the direction of one of my all-time favorites, Preston Sturges. He is a brewery heir, more obsessed with science than anything else, returning from an African expedition in the company of his valet/bodyguard (William Demarest, who’s always wonderful, especially in a Sturges film), and his pet snake. She is a con artist who happens to be on board the same ocean liner and sets her sights on him. It’s funny – and it compresses what would be the normal story arc into the first half of the movie, taking an unexpected but equally funny left turn for the second half.

I missed seeing “Christmas in Connecticut” this holiday season; TCM didn’t air it, although I think it may have been on another channel and I missed it. Stanwyck plays a Martha Stewart-like magazine columnist (the real Martha Stewart was four years old at the time) who is actually a fraud. She can’t cook, and she doesn’t have the Connecticut farm, husband or baby about which she writes with such charm. Her publisher (Sydney Greenstreet)  doesn’t know she’s a fake, and asks her if she and her husband can host a recuperating war hero (Dennis Morgan) at the farm for the holidays. If you know anything about Hollywood, you know where this story is headed, but that doesn’t make the journey any less hysterical.

One of my brothers recently saw “Ball of Fire” for the first time after reading my previous blog posts about it. Gary Cooper and a phalanx of character actors play ivory-tower academics, living together in a big house as they work on a  reference book. When they begin to talk about slang, they realize their cloistered lifestyle has left them completely ignorant of modern-day culture. By happenstance, they end up taking in a nightclub singer (Stanwyck, of course) who is in hiding due to a mob connection. Director Howard Hawks thought of the story as a sort of grown-up version of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarves,” and there’s even a publicity still of the professors (other than Cooper), each one standing in front of his Disney counterpart.

Taken together, these movies show that Stanwyck was a lot funnier and more vital in her prime than the western matriarch I remember from my childhood.

Don’t be tardy, be TARDIS

Tonight is the season premiere of “Doctor Who,” a show about which I blog frequently. If you still haven’t discovered it yet, this might be a good time to jump in. (BBC America has a suggested hashtag, #newtowho.) I know I’m a broken record on this, but I’ve loved this show ever since college and I enjoy blogging about it.

“Doctor Who” is a British institution, as familiar over there as Superman or Mickey Mouse here in the states. It’s the story of The Doctor (“Doctor Who” is the title of the show, not necessarily the name of the character), a human-looking alien, of a race called the Time Lords. He travels through space and time in a vessel called a TARDIS which is phone-booth-sized on the outside but enormous on the inside. He’s usually accompanied by one or more traveling companions, and tonight’s season premiere begins a new era of the show with a new sidekick. More about that in a moment.

“Doctor Who” premiered in 1963, and (trivia fact) its premiere was the first entertainment program to air after the BBC ended its extended coverage of the Kennedy assassination. That means it will celebrate its 50th anniversary later this year, amid much hoopla. The original show ran until about 1989. It started running on some American public TV stations during the science fiction craze that followed “Star Wars,” and I first discovered it while a college student in Oklahoma in the early 1980s.

“Doctor Who” was considered a children’s show when it first went on the air, and it sort of grew up with its viewers in its original run. It still has a whimsy and sense of fun that owes a lot to its kid-vid roots.

There was an attempt to bring the show back in 1996 as a British/American co-production, and a TV movie was produced, airing here on the FOX network. But it flopped. The BBC brought the show back on its own in 2005, and it’s been on ever since.  The new version aired on Sci-Fi (now SyFy) for a few years but is now on BBC America. You can also find it, along with episodes from the original version, on Netflix.

Unlike “Star Trek” or some other long-running TV shows, “Doctor Who” hasn’t relied on new generations or do-overs to give it longevity. It’s basically the same continuity, with the same character, running all the way back to 1963. But the main character has been played by 11 different actors.

73f4325d-320a-4504-bb18-96d533f3ae1a

When original star William Hartnell quit the show in the mid-1960s, the BBC wanted to keep it going, and the producers invented a plot twist that probably wouldn’t have passed muster if the show had been aimed at adults. They simply established that Time Lords, when subjected to extreme physical trauma, could regenerate themselves, creating a new body. Each new incarnation is still The Doctor, with all of his memories, but may have subtle differences in personality or outlook caused by the transformation. (Every so often, the joke gets made that another British icon – Bond, James Bond – must also be a Time Lord.)

Hartnell (far left in the collage above) was white-haired and grandfatherly, but suddenly The Doctor, now played by Patrick Troughton, had black bangs and was considerably more energetic. There were seven different Doctors in the show’s original run. The most famous here in America was Tom Baker, with his curly hair, droopy eyes and long, multi-colored scarf, because his episodes were the ones that started showing up first during that post-“Star Wars” period. The last Doctor from the original show, Sylvester McCoy, appeared in the first few minutes of the TV movie, providing continuity with the old show, before regenerating into Paul McGann, who would have starred in that ill-fated revival. When the show was relaunched in 2005, Christopher Eccleston played the role, followed by David Tennant and the current Doctor, Matt Smith.

The traveling companions are an important part of the show. Of course, they also give an excuse for cheesy exposition – The Doctor delights in showing Earthlings the sights, throughout space and time. He explains to them, and by proxy to us the viewer, any critical pieces of information.

Matt Smith started the show with Amy Pond (Karen Gillan) as his traveling companion, joined eventually by Pond’s fiance, then husband, Rory Williams (Arthur Darvill). They left the show, in heartbreaking fashion, at the end of its last regular season.

timthumbThe new companion, Clara (Jenna Louise Coleman) was introduced during an episode last season and then introduced more fully during the Christmas special that fell between the two seasons. In both each of those appearances, she was killed – leading the Doctor to wonder who she is and how she can be reincarnated time and again throughout history. I suspect that question will be a running theme this season, but hopefully she’ll get to stick around a little longer at a time. She’s not Kenny from “South Park,” after all. (Or is she? That would be an interesting crossover.)

Anyway, the start of a new season might be a good chance to try the show out if you’ve never seen it before. It’s a wonderful mix. Some episodes are funny, some terrifying, some heartbreaking. There was a wonderful episode where The Doctor and Amy try to change the fate of Vincent Van Gogh. There are also recurring villains – notably the Daleks, salt-shaker-shaped cyborgs predating R2-D2 by 15 years; the Cybermen, who were like the Borg long before Jean-Luc Picard was a gleam in Gene Roddenberry’s eye; The Master, a sinister rival Time Lord; and the Weeping Angels, an invention of current executive producer Steven Moffat, murderous statues who can only move when no one is looking at them.

The season premiere, “The Bells of Saint John,” airs tonight at 7 p.m. Central (8 Eastern) on BBC America. Check it out.

Back in the drying business

The other day, I posted about the sad shape into which the trays of my dehydrator had fallen. I planned to find a dehydrator at Goodwill or pick up a new one later this summer.

I got an e-mail from a good friend out of state (I’m not sure if she’d want me to identify her, so I’ll leave it out for now) who asked if she could give me a dehydrator. I turned her down, but she offered again. I looked at Goodwill, and they had every type of kitchen gadget except dehydrators, and then, feeling guilty about it, I accepted. This was the source of my Facebook post the other day about having better friends than I deserve.

The dehydrator arrived today. It’s basically the same model I used to have, but with a couple of tweaks and improvements. I’m thrilled! I had to break it in, and (like most dehydrators) it came with sample packets of the dry cure and seasoning you use for ground meat jerky. So I went and bought some ground beef and some slightly-green bananas (which work better for banana chips). The beef jerky should be done before I go to bed tonight, and I’ll put some banana chips in overnight. NESCO claims that the air flow in its trays prevents flavor-mixing, so in theory you can dry sweet and savory items at the same time. But  you can’t do beef and bananas at the same time because they take different temperatures. As I stated in the previous post, you should never buy a dehydrator without a temperature control; if it’s set hot enough for jerky, which is probable, it’s too hot for a lot of other uses, such as banana chips.

By the way, the standard for “hot enough for jerky” has crept up slightly. My old dehydrator’s top setting, used for jerky, was 155 degrees; this one is 160 degrees, which is what the USDA recommends for dried meat. However, the salt, sugar, and acid in jerky seasonings and marinades, and the fact that you’re removing most of the moisture, go a long way towards reducing the risk. I’ve never had any problem with homemade jerky, my own or anyone else’s. Alton Brown on his show “Good Eats” recommends using no heat at all – he jury-rigs a box fan and furnace filters to provide enough airflow to dry the meat quickly without adding heat (see the video below). I have to admit that I’ve sometimes used slightly lower-than-recommended heat settings on jerky, especially if I was letting it run overnight and didn’t want to get it jaw-breakingly dry.

Anyway, I’m going to make some jerky for my benefactor, but I’m not sending any from tonight’s batch. The ground meat jerky seasonings that come with dehydrators, and that are sold next to the dehydrators at Walmart, are OK but usally kind of boring. I will wait and make some whole-muscle jerky using my normal marinade (which is based on Alton Brown’s, as seen below), and send that, or else I’ll make some ground meat jerky using Hi Mountain Jerky seasonings, which are excellent. They are sometimes found at Walmart, but usually over in the grocery section rather than next to the dehydrators.

I am just thrilled to have the dehydrator. I have a few extra sweet onions kicking around, and tomorrow I may try drying them out before they sprout on me.

Waiting for the other shoe to drop

It’s been a good day.

* I had a great morning with the first-graders at Learning Way Elementary. Donna Brock, I saw your daughter in the halls going somewhere with her class, and she waved at me. Next week is spring break, so it will be two weeks until I go back.

*I went to the doctor for a routine checkup and he commented favorably on my continued weight loss. One person at each of the two churches where I preached yesterday asked if I’d lost weight.

*A dear friend has done something very generous that solved the dehydrator problem I referred to yesterday. I’m humbled by it.

*Because my doctor’s appointment was in Murfreesboro, I grabbed a quick supper at Steak ‘N Shake, which I love and never get the chance to go to.

The worst thing that’s happened so far is that I missed a vehicle in my blind spot when merging onto I-24 and had a near miss – which would have been completely my fault. But nothing happened.

I keep waiting for something bad to happen.

Crumbling jerky infrastructure

I found a type of lean roast with lengthwise grain – perfect for jerky, but normally too expensive – on sale for half price at the grocery store today.

The jerky is in my dehydrator right now, but as I put it there I realized into what poor shape my dehydrator has fallen. The problem is not the part with the fan and heating element – the problem is with the plastic trays that allow air to circulate around the food. They’re made of plastic, tricky to clean, and I’ve had my dehyrdator so long, and used it so often, that they’re starting to fall apart. I had to throw one away today, and several others have holes in them (I just laid strips of jerky over the holes).

You can get replacement / expansion trays; the dehydrator originally came with four trays, if I recall correctly, and I bought a two-pack of expansion trays twice. At its peak, it had eight trays. Now it’s down to five, almost all of them in poor shape.

It would cost $38 to buy six new trays on Amazon. That’s somewhere between the cost of the cheapest Nesco dehydrator on Amazon and the next-to-cheapest, which is the one I own. So I probably need to just bite the bullet and get a new dehydrator. It may be a couple of months before I can get to it.

Unfortunately, the cheapest dehydrator – $30 – does not have a temperature control. That means it’s permanently set to the maximum temperature, which means it’s OK for beef jerky, but too hot (no matter what the instructions say) to do banana chips, apple chips or things like that. And sometimes, especially if I’m letting a batch of jerky in the dehydrator run overnight, I want to turn it down to a little lower than the recommended jerky setting.

Maybe I’ll check Goodwill; I’m sure there are people who’ve bought dehydrators and used them once or twice before getting tired of them.

Not Fade Away (2013)

Because I got the call to preach at the last minute, I dug through the “sermons and devotionals” folder on my hard drive and found two earlier occasions when I spoke on Palm Sunday. This is basically my 2009 sermon, with a few tweaks and a paragraph lifted from my 2002 sermon.

Mt. Lebanon UMC and Cannon UMC
Palm Sunday – March 23, 2013

Luke 19:28-40 (NRSV)
19:28 After he had said this, he went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem.

19:29 When he had come near Bethphage and Bethany, at the place called the Mount of Olives, he sent two of the disciples,

19:30 saying, “Go into the village ahead of you, and as you enter it you will find tied there a colt that has never been ridden. Untie it and bring it here.

19:31 If anyone asks you, ‘Why are you untying it?’ just say this, ‘The Lord needs it.’”

19:32 So those who were sent departed and found it as he had told them.

19:33 As they were untying the colt, its owners asked them, “Why are you untying the colt?”

19:34 They said, “The Lord needs it.”

19:35 Then they brought it to Jesus; and after throwing their cloaks on the colt, they set Jesus on it.

19:36 As he rode along, people kept spreading their cloaks on the road.

19:37 As he was now approaching the path down from the Mount of Olives, the whole multitude of the disciples began to praise God joyfully with a loud voice for all the deeds of power that they had seen,

19:38 saying, “Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest heaven!”

19:39 Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, order your disciples to stop.”

19:40 He answered, “I tell you, if these were silent, the stones would shout out.”

In 2005, I made my second short-term mission trip to Kenya. On my first trip the year before, we’d been working in the Kibera slums right outside Nairobi. But on this trip, we were working in a place called Ndonyo, in southwestern Kenya. It was a six-or-eight-hour drive for our team, which was riding in two weather-beaten vans.
Continue reading

Donna Brock liked this post

Jaypocalypse 2

Much of the coverage of the rumor that Jay Leno will be replaced in 2014 by Jimmy Fallon, seemingly confirmed by the all-knowing, all-seeing Bill Carter of the New York Times, has centered on the “Groundhog Day” aspect. Didn’t they try to replace Jay with a younger host just a few years ago? And didn’t it work out badly?

Well, this time may be quite different.

First, a confession: I’m a long-time fan of David Letterman, a long-time fan of Conan O’Brien, a fan of Jimmy Fallon, and I haven’t cared for Leno ever since he got “The Tonight Show” and lost the edgy humor he used to have as a guest on “Late Night with David Letterman” on NBC. I find him bland, uncreative and unfunny. It was his hardball manager, the late Helen Kushnick, who was responsible for some behind-the-scenes maneuvering that helped contribute to Johnny Carson’s retirement and which unfairly denied Dave the right to compete for the job that even Johnny thought was rightfully his. But Leno bears some responsibility.

That doesn’t mean I’m not a tiny sympathetic to Leno. My brother loaned me Carter’s book “The War For Late Night: When Leno Went Early And Television Went Crazy” over the holidays, and I still have it. Leno was forced in 2004 into agreeing to the 2009 handoff to Conan O’Brien, and it’s easy to understand why he would feel somewhat miffed about having to give up the job while still number one in the ratings. He probably feels the same way in 2013. And Carter’s book reveals that it was the NBC executives, as much as Leno, who orchestrated bringing Leno back to “The Tonight Show.”

But, as I said, I think things may work out differently this time. Here are a few reasons why:

* Jimmy Fallon is not Conan O’Brien. As funny as I think Conan is, it’s clear that O’Brien, a former editor of the Harvard Lampoon, is in some ways an acquired taste. To his artistic credit, and his professional harm, he made little attempt to make his comedy more mainstream or accessible when he moved from “Late Night” to “The Tonight Show.” Good for him, and for viewers like me who like him. But in retrospect, and after reading Carter’s book, I think Conan’s argument that he’d have eventually been able to bring up “The Tonight Show”’s ratings isn’t that compelling. It may be that Conan is always going to play to a certain niche audience, even if I’m part of the niche.

Fallon, on the other hand, has a style of humor that is naturally more accessible. I still think he’s funny, and creative, and with a lot more imagination than Leno, but I think his personality plays better to a broad audience. (Capital One probably wouldn’t be using him for commercials otherwise.)

* Lorne Michaels will be involved. When David Letterman left NBC, the network turned the “Late Night” franchise over to the creator and executive producer of “Saturday Night Live,” and it was he who personally recruited O’Brien (over a lot of network skepticism) and then did the same for Fallon. Conan elected not to have Lorne’s production company involved when he moved west to host “The Tonight Show.” I probably wouldn’t have either, but in retrospect leaving Lorne behind may have hurt Conan in the long run. Carter’s book shows just how toxic the relationship between Conan and some of the NBC executives became, and in an alternate timeline Lorne might have been an important mediator between the two – holding the network execs at bay and finding ways for Conan to be more accessible without compromising his comedic vision. Fallon will have Lorne Michaels running interference for him with the NBC executives, and that counts for a lot. Also, Fallon will reportedly do “The Tonight Show” from New York, as in the days of Steve Allen, Jack Paar and the first decade of Johnny Carson. That will keep him under Lorne’s watchful eye.

* The landscape has changed. Although Jay Leno is beating “Jimmy Kimmel Live,” even in the advertiser-coveted 18-49 demographic, Kimmel’s move this year to direct, head-to-head competition with Jay and Dave has been relatively successful, and NBC executives reportedly feel that he’ll eventually draw away more and more of the younger viewers unless they strike back by putting a younger-skewing host into play. Dave probably has a few more years at CBS, and I’m not sure CBS would be willing to try a much-younger host in that time slot right now anyway. (I suspect that when Dave hangs it up, they’ll just give @CraigyFerg the job.)

Yes, Johnny Majors may be a great coach, but he’s near the end of his career, and we have to think about the future, and we’re afraid we’re going to lose Phil Fulmer, who is obviously our guy for the future, so we’re going to unceremoniously push Johnny aside and get Phil into the head coach’s office before we lose him to someone else.

I’m just blithering, of course, and restating points made more elegantly by others elsewhere. But as a fan of all but one of the late night hosts, I thought I needed to jump into the fray.