Lake Neuron

Not valid unless signed

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’


Published April 14th, 2008

Down with analog?

Ivy shared this Mark Cuban post in Google Reader. It’s a radical proposition (as you might expect, given the source), but it actually makes quite a bit of sense:

If we want to truly change the course of broadband in this country, the solution is simple. Just as we had an analog shutdown date for over the air TV signals, we need the same resolution for analog delivered cable networks.

Transition basic cable networks from analog to digital over the next 3 years and all of the sudden there will be hundreds of megabits available on the smallest cable systems and more than a gigabit of bandwidth available on the largest.

I have to say, I’ve grumbled about the here-and-there erosion of basic cable to free up digital bandwidth — losing individual channels, one or two at a time. But I didn’t really understand the numbers as Cuban explains them. If this were done the way that Cuban suggests, doing away with analog in one fell swoop and making some form of digital package the new “basic” cable, and if the pricing could be kept competitive, it might be a major step forward.

Published January 13th, 2008

‘We need a dialogue’

Newscoma was responding to a meme, and I thought her remarks on one issue were particularly well-stated and in line with my own concerns:

3 — How would you describe your views on immigration policies in the U.S.?

I think that we need to treat everyone the same first of all and quit making the word “immigrant” a dirty word, which irritates the crap out of me. There are legal immigrants in this country and there are illegal immigrants here but the national argument is mind-blowing to me. There are laws on the books already to deal with the issue but we have forgotten human decency in this national/statewide argument. I find the whole immigration debate to be very important on one level though, and that is the Sneetches argument that certain folks want to make it an us-and-them thing. We need a dialogue, not a bunch of finger pointing.

Absolutely. Sure, there many are legitimate issues about border security, eligibility for social services, and what have you, that need to be discussed, frankly and openly. But there’s an edge, an undercurrent, to the whole immigration debate as it now exists that sends a shiver down my spine.

Published December 18th, 2007

It’s all the buzz

If you’ve ever used the online word processor originally known as Writely which is now part of Google Documents, you may want to check out BuzzWord, a similar type of product which is now owned by Adobe. I found out about it from j.bentley, who has a great review of the program.

Online word processors are great for collaboration — different people can access a document and make changes to it, no matter what platform they’re using or where they’re located, and they can usually leave sticky notes or comments attached to the document. They can also be an alternative for someone who wants to work on a document from various locations but doesn’t want to carry it along with them on a laptop or thumb drive for some reason. They can even be a way of backing up an important document, since the documents are hosted on the online word processor’s servers instead of on your computer. You can create a document in BuzzWord, of course, but you can also import documents created in a traditional word processor. (One quibble: at present, BuzzWord can only import Word or rich text documents, not OpenOffice documents, which Google accepts. So I have to use OpenOffice to save something in Word format before uploading it.)

BuzzWord has a Flash-heavy interface which is definitely more fun and flashy (no pun intended) than Google Documents. It also seems to take larger documents, since a document of mine which grew too large for Google Documents uploaded to BuzzWord with no problem.

It’s worth checking out and playing with, even if you don’t use it on a regular basis. You may need it at some point in the future to share a document with others.

Published April 25th, 2007

An important message

Published April 12th, 2007

K-Co

All right, I admit it. I was wrong. And I’m now the very last person in Middle Tennessee to blog about the Kat Coble situation. Kat is being asked by an attorney to take down some posts about a career services company with which she and her husband had a bad experience.

I was reluctant to post yesterday about the matter. I was concerned that a minor outbreak of support would actually aggravate the situation. I was also a little annoyed at some of the “don’t back down” and “give ‘em heck” posts; it’s really easy to hand out that kind of advice when it’s not your name on the cease-and-desist letter. Traditional media outlets know that the threat of a defamation lawsuit must sometimes be taken seriously even if you’re innocent; a plaintiff with deep pockets or some other easy access to legal counsel can keep appealing and continuing until the process becomes a form of punishment and you’re forced to settle just to stop the bleeding. It’s never happened to me, thank God, but I know of it happening.

But what I didn’t forsee — and should have — is that Kat would actually get a major outpouring of support, including publicity from nationally-known web sites like Fark and Instapundit, and an offer of legal counsel from the Media Bloggers’ Association. Bob Krumm also took brilliant advantage of Google search ranking algorithms. The fight isn’t over by any means, but it’s out in the open — which is precisely what her opponents don’t want.

I’ve only been to one blogger meet-up. That’s not by choice; it’s just that a lot of the scheduled activities have been on days when I’ve had to work. But I did attend a meet-up last year sponsored by WKRN in downtown Nashville. I arrived horrifically early, as I often do, and I was wandering the sidewalks of Broadway, looking like a tourist, killing time before heading to the GEC for the meeting. Kat Coble, who’d never met me before, saw me on the street and recognized me from the photo which used to be on my site. “You must be John Carney!” she said, and I was immediately impressed.

I should have known that Kat’s case would attract this kind of interest and this kind of support. For the sake of free expression, for all of us, I hope the news continues to be good.

Published March 30th, 2007

Birthday greetings

Happy birthday, Art! Have fun in Florida!

Published March 28th, 2007

A nice little box

Newscoma has an honest, gut-wrenching and informative post about domestic violence.

I don’t claim to know much about the topic; a civic club I used to belong to supported our local domestic violence shelter here for a while, and I heard a little about it at that time. But I know it’s a lot more common, and a lot more tragic, than most of us understand or would like to admit.

Go read this.

Published January 22nd, 2005

My Idol picks: “Why [BLANK] should blog”

blogger_idol-1.gif
This week’s “Blogger Idol” theme is “Why [insert occupation here] should blog.”

Here are some of my favorites:

Published January 16th, 2005

Blogger Idol: Why Journalists Should Blog

blogger_idol-1.gif
This week’s “Blogger Idol” theme is “Why [insert occupation here] should blog.”

I’m a journalist, although I’m currently going through some serious questioning about what my next career should be. Since I haven’t answered that question, I’m stuck in journalism. Journalism and blogging are uneasy partners; journalists, being writers, would seem to take naturally to blogging, but some of them have gotten into serious trouble by second-guessing their employers or compromising their integrity in this type of alternate forum. For example, a journalist might have a story spiked, heavily edited or delayed, and might disagree with his editors about the reasons for doing this. The journalist then vents his frustration by blogging about the story in his own private forum, and that causes embarrassment to everyone involved. Or a journalist who tries hard to be objective and fair in print betrays his private political leanings in his private blog, and compromises the editorial integrity of the newspaper.

It’s for reasons like these that I generally avoid posting about work-related topics in this forum, except in a few isolated and non-controversial cases.

The Blogger Idol web site, in the post setting up this week’s topic, has links to several posts about occupational blogging, including a terrific blog entry by Tim Porter in defense of journalists being allowed to blog. Porter steals some of the points I might have otherwise made in this post. Here’s a terrific quote from Porter:

Newspapers need more creativity, not less; they need their reporters and editors to be more expressive, not less. Newspapers should do all they can to encourage their staff members to as creative as possible outside the office with the hope that this energy returns to the newsroom.

Blogging is writing. Blogging is photography. Blogging is communicating. These are all good things for newspapers.

Amen. I can certainly understand how specific instances of work-related blogging could cause problems for journalists, but I think it’s important that journalism organizations not react to these problems with a ham-handed prohibition of blogging in general.

It would be hard to prove it from my actual blog entries, which are sometimes rushed and sloppy, but I believe blogging helps make me a better writer. And writing is an important part of journalism. (It’s the part I love, which is part of my vocational hand-wringing.) I try not to make this a “dear diary” sort of blog, but it does include personal experience. That’s cathartic, especially for someone who’s single and doesn’t have a life partner to talk to. At the same time, I don’t have to feel as if I’m imposing on anyone; you can read if you’re interested and walk away (or skip to the next entry) if you’re not, and I’m none the wiser. I do worry that I might drive people off if the blog becomes too much about the minutiae of my life.

Anyway, I seem to have wandered afield. I think blogging can be beneficial to journalists for many of the same reasons it’s beneficial to non-journalists. It’s a way to communicate with the world, to start a conversation, to share ideas, to blow off a little steam. With some discretion and common sense, it can be productive and enjoyable.

Published January 11th, 2005

My picks for Blogger Idol: “I Love ….”

blogger_idol-1.gif
My post this week in “Blogger Idol” wasn’t that hot — I should have waited a while and come up with something better. It’s not as if I have to be the first or second person to post every week.
Anyway, here are my five picks for the week. The topic was “I Love ….”

Published January 6th, 2005

Blogger Idol: The Jerky Boy sounds off on love

blogger_idol-1.gif

This week’s Blogger Idol topic is “I love…” After pontificating about Christmas gifts, travel and New Year’s resolutions in previous Blogger Idol posts, I figured I would spare you some pseudo-intellectual blither about love. I could post another excerpt from my recent speed-written novel (like I did for “First Dates”), but my characters are still romantically giddy; they’re approaching love, but it would be wrong to say they’ve gotten there.

Instead, I will tell you what’s in my dehydrator as I write this.

I love beef jerky. Yes, I realize that the English word “love” is overused, and it lacks the nuances of the various Greek words (philos, eros, agape). It’s flippant to talk about loving beef jerky. But I think I’ll do it anyway.

I first bought a dehydrator some years ago, and switched to a much better model a few years later. I occasionally make banana chips — and ought to do it more often — and I will sometimes dry half of an onion when I only need part of it for a recipe. But what I most often use my dehydrator for is jerky.

Jerky has grown in popularity in recent years due to low-carb, high-protein diets. Actually, if properly made, it’s also low in fat — fat spoils before meat does, so for home jerky-making, you always want to choose the leanest possible cut of meat and trim it as well as possible.

There are two main kinds of jerky: whole muscle jerky, which is made from slices of meat, and ground meat jerky, which is made from seasoned ground meat which is shaped into strips or sticks. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Ground meat jerky is easier to make, and it doesn’t require overnight marinating. You normally just mix the ground meat with a commercial seasoning-and-cure blend, and maybe rest it for a few hours in the fridge to allow the flavors to permeate. You have control of the size and shape of the pieces, and you can make them all standard in size and appearance (especially if you have a jerky gun, a little plastic gadget that works like a caulking gun). The jerky is not as tough or chewy as whole muscle jerky. I highly recommend Hi Mountain Jerky Seasoning, which comes in numerous flavors, for ground meat jerky, and it’s terrific with whole muscle jerky as well. You can get it at Wal-Mart Supercenters, other stores and online.

I tend to use commercial seasonings for ground meat jerky, because it’s especially important to use cure when you’re working with ground meat. Many types of contamination occur in the presence of oxygen. Those organisms tend to live on the surface and are killed when you sear the outside of a piece of meat, which is why people can eat rare steak with no ill effect. But when meat is ground, the oxygen-feeding organisms are distributed throughout, which is why ground beef needs to be handled more carefully than whole muscle meat.

Follow the directions for any jerky cure or recipe carefully — cure contains not only salt and sugar but sodium nitrite. Nitrites are found in many processed meats. They not only help kill harmful bacteria but they fix a pleasant red or reddish-brown color. They’re important — but you don’t want to overdo them because they can be carcinogenic in large amounts.

The salt in a jerky cure is important — it’s there not only for flavor but as a preservative. Unfortunately, low-sodium jerky is not a practical option.

Many extension offices and the USDA now recommend heating meat to 160 degrees before drying it. My dehydrator has a top temperature setting of 155 degrees, which is what I use for jerky. I have never taken the extra step of pre-cooking, nor have I ever had a problem with my jerky (or anyone else’s). But I wanted to be sure and pass this recommendation along. Please don’t sue me.

Whole muscle jerky has the tougher, chewier texture many people want and expect from jerky — although, if you’re going to store and handle your jerky properly (store it in the fridge), you don’t have to dry it rock-hard, a common mistake. Whole muscle meat, cut with the grain 1/4 inch thick, can be “marinated” in dry seasoning and cure like Hi Mountain’s, or it can be marinated in a traditional liquid marinade. This is fun because you can experiment with your own flavor combinations. (Don’t forget a little touch of liquid smoke, unless you’ll be drying your jerky in a smoker. People expect jerky to taste smoky.) I have added cure (in the form of Morton’s Tender Quick) to marinade, but I’ve also made whole muscle jerky without a nitrite-based cure, and it’s turned out just fine. Your mileage may vary, however, so please don’t sue me.

I hadn’t made whole muscle jerky in a while. One of our pressmen at work is a hunter, and he’s brought in several batches of whole muscle venison jerky lately, and that got me thinking about jerky-making. The venison jerky was fine, but I generally stick to beef when I’m making my own. I look for the leanest cut I can on find that’s on sale. (In any case, homemade jerky is much cheaper, ounce for ounce, than storebought.) This time, I used the Hi Mountain dry seasoning and didn’t try to doctor the flavors or add any heat. I’ve sampled a bit of the warm, nearly-done jerky, and it tastes fantastic.

I picked this topic so that I could avoid bloviating, and it looks like I’ve bloviated anyway. Well, to use a famous quote (usually, but not definitively, attributed to Pascal), “This letter is so long because I didn’t have time to make it shorter.”

Published January 2nd, 2005

You say you want a … resolution?

blogger_idol-1.gif

Phisch has an excellent “Blogger Idol” post, and I’m not just saying that because she complimented the redesign of the blog. :)

Published January 1st, 2005

One more “Blogger Idol” pick

blogger_idol-1.gif

As usual, I was a bit premature with my “Blogger Idol” picks, and another worthy entry has shown up: Blog Business World

Published December 31st, 2004

Resolutions: My picks

blogger_idol-1.gif
This week’s “Blogger Idol” topic is “Resolutions.” Here, in no particular order, are some of my favorite entries so far:

Published December 28th, 2004

Resolutions

blogger_idol-1.gif

This week’s “Blogger Idol” topic is “Resolutions.”

Resolutions imply willpower, self-control. The type of resoution one announces for New Year’s is usually a big, ongoing project of some sort. “I resolve to lose weight.” “I resolve to pay down my debts.” “I resolve to be a better husband.”

Well, I’m not married, but those first two are things I need to do during the new year. Have I announced them as New Year’s resolutions? No. I have too much experience with such proclamations to take them seriously. Yes, I hope to make progress on both fronts. But I lack the confidence to promise. God has adequate capability to solve those problems and many others, but will I trust him? Will I have the wisdom and courage to follow his guidance and accept his grace?

Matthew 21:28-32 tells the story of two brothers. Their father asks them to work in the vineyard. One promises he will do so but doesn’t follow through. The other hems and haws but ends up doing the right thing in the end. Obviously, the passage points out, the second brother is the one who ultimately pleased the father. I have always identified with the second brother and feared becoming the first brother.

But those aren’t the only two options. Some would say that a resolution — a public pronouncement — can help firm up one’s sense of commitment and prod one into following through, lest one embarass one’s self.

It is very true that I could never have gone to Nicaragua or Kenya if I had tried to raise the money before making a decision. In that case, I had to announce that I was making a trip, and then once I had made the commitment, I (and my potential partners) had the responsibility for following up on it.

Perhaps that kind of public resolution would do me good. Perhaps it would push me out of the nest and force me to follow through. If I were to publicly announce, in my opinion page column in the Times-Gazette, that I wanted to lose 50 pounds in 2005, perhaps that would have an impact on my eating habits (at least in public). I don’t go out walking as often as I should, but I’m amazed at the people from my neighborhood whom I encounter in other settings. “I saw you out walking the other day, John,” some of them say, and I usually find that encouraging.

It’s just that I’m still not sure I have it in me to follow through, and I don’t want to be a hypocrite like the first brother.

I think I’ll continue to work out my salvation in fear and trembling, and leave the resolutions to others.