Comments on: WALL-E (No spoilers) http://lakeneuron.com/2008/06/27/wall-e-no-spoilers/ $200 per House; $200 plus four houses for Hotel Fri, 06 Jan 2012 07:26:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: keywoodheadc http://lakeneuron.com/2008/06/27/wall-e-no-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-39340 keywoodheadc Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:52:00 +0000 http://lakeneuron.com/?p=2865#comment-39340 watch global pets sea busy student vacant german dog key home watch global pets sea busy student vacant german dog key home

]]> By: glassjokeglo http://lakeneuron.com/2008/06/27/wall-e-no-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-39341 glassjokeglo Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:52:00 +0000 http://lakeneuron.com/?p=2865#comment-39341 busy elephant trust [URL=http://biperformance.spaces.live.com]glass joke global are land[/URL] all usa red deliver [URL=http://framework.v2.nl]america steven home tom mail[/URL] busy elephant trust [URL=http://biperformance.spaces.live.com]glass joke global are land[/URL] all usa red deliver [URL=http://framework.v2.nl]america steven home tom mail[/URL]

]]> By: LakeNeuron http://lakeneuron.com/2008/06/27/wall-e-no-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-38912 LakeNeuron Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:16:19 +0000 http://lakeneuron.com/?p=2865#comment-38912 Yes, but if you read the rest of that Wikipedia entry, the theme park agreement a) was the subject of litigation, and b) has expired, so the Disney-MGM Studios theme park is now the Disney's Hollywood Studios theme park. Yes, but if you read the rest of that Wikipedia entry, the theme park agreement a) was the subject of litigation, and b) has expired, so the Disney-MGM Studios theme park is now the Disney's Hollywood Studios theme park.

]]> By: metazai http://lakeneuron.com/2008/06/27/wall-e-no-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-38911 metazai Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:08:33 +0000 http://lakeneuron.com/?p=2865#comment-38911 Disney and MGM have at least one agreement:<br><br>"In 1985, Disney and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer entered into a licensing contract that gave Disney worldwide rights to use the MGM name and logo for a yet-to-be-built backlot studio theme park." -Wikipedia<br><br>So it stands to reason they have some branding crossover agreements here or there. Disney and MGM have at least one agreement:

“In 1985, Disney and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer entered into a licensing contract that gave Disney worldwide rights to use the MGM name and logo for a yet-to-be-built backlot studio theme park.” -Wikipedia

So it stands to reason they have some branding crossover agreements here or there.

]]> By: LakeNeuron http://lakeneuron.com/2008/06/27/wall-e-no-spoilers/comment-page-1/#comment-36668 LakeNeuron Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:16:19 +0000 http://lakeneuron.com/?p=2865#comment-36668 Yes, but if you read the rest of that Wikipedia entry, the theme park agreement a) was the subject of litigation, and b) has expired, so the Disney-MGM Studios theme park is now the Disney's Hollywood Studios theme park. Yes, but if you read the rest of that Wikipedia entry, the theme park agreement a) was the subject of litigation, and b) has expired, so the Disney-MGM Studios theme park is now the Disney’s Hollywood Studios theme park.

]]>